Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Art: The Prints Market Crumbles
It's hard to judge the state of the art market by looking at auction results of unique paintings, precisely because they're unique and you can always make an argument about why this or that particular painting did or didn't sell at a certain level. So Deborah Ripley's report for Artnet about the prints market, which is much more fungible, is invaluable -- and shows just how bad things are, and how much capitulation is yet to come:
Both houses offered "Campbell's Soup II," the portfolio of 10 silkscreens from 1969. The set at Christie's, estimated at $150,000-$250,000, opened at $95,000 and drew no bids. At Sotheby's, where the estimate was $200,000-$300,000, the lot opened at $110,000 and also elicited no bidding... (The top price for "Campbell's Soup II" is $312,000, paid at Phillips de Pury & Co. on May 18, 2007.)...
This paradigm shift of prices had still not penetrated the dealer rank-and-file that participated in the International Fine Print Dealers Association (IFPDA) Print Fair at the Park Avenue Armory, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2008. Although Sotheby's failed to sell -- for a second time -- Picasso's bellwether L'Egyptienne from 1953, which carried a presale estimate of $125,000-$150,000, the print was offered in two booths, both with price tags of $300,000.
The fact that Campbell's Soup II had no bidders at $95,000 shocks me, I have to admit. Yes, the edition size (250, I believe) is reasonably large, but then again the art world is weird when it comes to supply-and-demand dynamics: the highest-priced artists, from Picasso to Warhol to Hirst, tend to also be the most prolific. This is one of the most iconic works of the 20th Century, by the iconic artist of the post-War era, and there just doesn't seem to be any interest in it at all.
This bodes ill for next week's Contemporary sales, I think -- but we don't have to wait long now. The best hope is that buyers of prints are not the same people as buyers of paintings, and that the painting-buyers have deeper pockets, are more committed to the market, and are less affected by the financial crisis. We'll see.






