Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Bleak Christie's Sale
Christie's had a big impressionist-and-modern sale last night, and the results, in Carol Vogel's headline, were bleak. All the biggest-ticket pieces failed to sell, with a Rothko estimated at $20 million to $30 million being passed after not even getting a single bid at $10 million.
In Marion Maneker's round-up, the word "bargain" appears three times -- but I have to say I'm unclear on what exactly the word is supposed to mean, when it's applied to a $4.4 million Toulouse-Lautrec portrait or a $2.2 million Miró. I think it's a combination of two things: the price as compared to its low estimate, and the price as compared to the amount that the work would have fetched at the height of the market.
Those are interesting numbers, to be sure, but it's worth remembering that art is a negative-carry asset with purely aesthetic intrinsic value. Is it possible for someone to get $4.4 million of aesthetic value out of putting a Toulouse-Lautrec on his wall? I don't know how you could even begin to answer that question. But if a painting is to be a bargain in a financial sense, that can only mean that it's worth less than it will be able to fetch in the future -- not less than it was able to fetch in the past.
For me, the Christie's sale is an important turning point, because it has turned the conventional wisdom on its head. For years now -- and this meme went unchallenged even after it was clear that the art market was going south -- we've been told that the very best works, at the very top of the market, were the ones most likely to keep their value, while second-rate works would suffer the most.
And yet last night it was the second-tier works which sold: a Seurat drawing of a house, for instance, fetched $1.1 million, even as the more high-profile lots got no bidders at all.
As we enter a major recession, the era for trophy-hunting is surely coming to an end. Spending eight-figure sums on paintings is no longer somthing to brag about, and I doubt that the likes of Ken Griffin have nearly as much appetite for such purchases as they did a year or two ago. Maybe, then, it's the masterpiece premium which will erode most quickly, leaving the second-tier works to outperform for the first time in many years.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





