Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Stocks are Like Bonds
Many thanks to Nadav Manham, who, after reading my exchange with Jim Surowiecki, pointed me to a fabulous (if long) article which Warren Buffett published in Fortune in 1977. Headlined "How Inflation Swindles the Equity Investor", it details how a huge amount of the change in stock prices can be very simply explained by considering them to be perpetual bonds with a 12% coupon -- 12% being, in 1977, most companies' ROE.
Since then, of course, US companies have levered up quite a lot, and their ROE is now much higher. But Buffett's article is well worth revisiting all the same. For one thing, it's the best argument I've ever seen in favor of companies retaining earnings rather than paying them out as dividends -- something which helps explain why Berkshire Hathaway is so dividend-averse. After reading Buffett, you're inclined to think that pretty much all companies trading above book value should do the same. And for another thing, it's easy to see, using Buffett's lens, why stock prices have risen so far since his article came out, thanks to a combination of falling interest rates, low inflation, and higher leverage.
William Bernstein also has an interesting stocks-as-weird-bonds lens, explaining that dividends never fall as fast as stock prices, and that therefore long-term investors actually want stocks to go down, since that increases the value of their reinvested dividends.
What any of this means for today's stock-market investors I have no idea. But at the very least it's a refreshing change from the noisy and unhelpful daily stream of commentary on which stocks are up and which are down from where they opened this morning.






