Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Unreassurable Markets
Megan Barnett has a good question: how come investment banks' CDS spreads are widening, even in the face of an all-but-explicit government guarantee that they won't be allowed to fail?
The easy answer is that the markets are panicking. Boy was I wrong when I said on Monday that I thought "the big 700-point down days are behind us". If the stock market plunges, then CDS gap out; there's a very strong correlation there. On a fundamental basis, high volatility on the stock market means increased tail risk, and buying CDS is one way of protecting against tail risk.
Could the increased spreads be a sign that investors are starting to use the banks as counterparties again, and are hedging themselves in the CDS market? That's probably a stretch, but I suppose it's possible.
I do think that Megan's put her finger on something important: the rise of CDS as a credit-market indicator and as a hedging device is acting as a brake on any moves back towards trust and liquidity. Back in the olden days, individual banks all made their own determinations of whether Morgan Stanley was trustworthy. Now, they just look at where the CDS is trading, and decide that it isn't: a classic example of a vicious cascade.
More generally, in these days of volatility and hedge-fund squeezes, if a certain market move doesn't make any sense at all, there's a good chance that's exactly what's going to happen. The government's backstopped too-big-to-fail banks, including Morgan Stanley? Great! Watch those spreads gap out to 480bp!
Maybe the market will simply not accept Morgan Stanley as a counterparty unless or until it's nationalized. I'm sure that at this point John Mack would be quite happy to sell out to Treasury at just about any price -- and MUFG would be happy too, given that they'd then essentially be getting a 10% coupon on their Treasury bonds.
The XLF financials ETF plunged more than 10% today, with Morgan Stanley doing even worse than that. Financials are about as far removed from retail sales as it gets; the old worries about financial meltdown are still just as much on traders' minds as the new worries about economic meltdown. The world's governments have done their best to put those worries to rest, but there was always a risk that their best wouldn't be good enough. After today's stock-market implosion, that risk is more real than ever.






