Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Topsy-Turvy Datapoint of the Day, Fannie Mae CDS Edition
Reuters reports on the results of the Frannie CDS auction:
Protection sellers on the companies' subordinated debt were the biggest winners, with contracts on Fannie Mae's subordinated debt recovering 99.9 percent of the sum insured...
Credit default swaps on the senior debt, by contrast, will recover less, with Fannie Mae's senior swaps recovering 91.51 percent the sum insured.
This is what happens when markets go haywire: credit default swaps lose all connection with, well, credit -- and start trading on entirely technical factors. I don't understand why recovery on the senior debt was so low, or why recovery on the sub debt was so high; it probably has something to do with eligibility requirements for cheapest-to-deliver bonds, and the relatively popularity of insuring the sub debt against default rather than the senior debt.
But in any event, instruments with a US government guarantee -- senior Fannie Mae bonds -- are clearing at 91.5 cents on the dollar. Remember that, if you think that the stock markets are ugly.
Update: Alea confirms that it's a CTD artifact:
Some people are surprised that the sub recover more than the senior, this is due to the cheapest to deliver effect, both the FNM/FRE senior have zero coupon on the deliverable list, while there are no zero sub.
Which just goes to show how important it is to know exactly what you're buying, when you buy default protection.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





