Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Stocks: Are Retail Investors Buying?
For many years, whenever any global economy threatened to run out of steam, the US consumer would step in to save the day. Now, it seems, the US consumer is tapped out -- at least when it comes to personal consumption expenditures.
But looking at the action in the stock market today and over the past week or so, I wonder if the indefatigable US consumer isn't simply shifting his attention to stocks. Dow 10,000? Must be a buying opportunity!
Stocks aren't cheap -- certainly not when compared to bonds. But when stocks have fallen a lot, people rush in to buy "bargains" based on nothing more than the all-but-meaningless metric of percentage off all-time highs.
The magnitude of the housing crash, in terms of percentage off highs, is important, because such a vast proportion of the population either bought or refinanced at top-of-the-bubble valuations. But that doesn't make houses cheap. In the case of stocks, the percentage-off-highs number is not important, because there wasn't particularly high volume at those high points in any case. And it's certainly not a bullish indicator, as some of the value investors at today's conference maybe hoped.
Both days that we've seen a 700-point down move in the Dow, it's been followed by a sharp and immediate retracement of about half the losses. I put that down to bargain hunters, looking at the sell-off like they might a 30% off sticker at their local department store.
Or put it this way: there's a huge "sale" going on in the credit markets too, but the credit markets are largely inaccessible to retail investors, who discount future cashflows at a much lower interest rate than anybody who's actually tried to borrow money in this market. When stocks fall towards the kind of levels implied by credit-market discount rates, retail investors, with their much lower discount rates, step in and catch the falling knife. So far, they've ended up very bloody every time they've tried to pull off this act.
A smarter move, for a long-term investor, would be to wait for the credit markets to return to some semblance of normality before jumping into stocks. You might not buy at the absolute bottom -- but anybody who fancies themselves a market timer is deluded anyway. And you'll have much less in the way of downside.






