Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Hank Paulson, Buy-Sider
The details of RTC II are emerging, and it's pretty simple: give Hank Paulson $700 billion, let him buy up mortgage-related toxic waste, and thereby rescue the banks and save the global financial system.
Henry Blodget asks one key question: how on earth will these things be priced? All we know so far is that it's going to be set up as a reverse auction, but that raises more questions than it answers. Reverse auctions are easy if you're dealing with something fungible. But CDOs and MBSs and the like are all unique, and I have a feeling that Paulson will have to hire a large number of highly-qualified bond-market professionals to look very carefully at every instrument on a case-by-case basis. My guess is that there will be some kind of performance-related pay, which will be an interesting development as far as the civil service is concerned.
The good news is that there are probably a lot of those highly-qualified bond-market professionals looking for work right now. The bad news, of course, is that they are the people who created the problem in the first place: is there any particular reason to believe that they'll be a particularly effective solution?
One thing does need to be cleared up: this, from the NYT, is confusing, and pretty much false.
The ambitious effort to transfer the bad debts of Wall Street, at least temporarily, into the obligations of American taxpayers, was first put forward by the administration late last week.
I'm pretty certain that Paulson is not going to buy up the obligations of Wall Street banks, let alone guarantee them. If you hold bonds issued by Goldman Sachs or Wells Fargo, they're going to remain obligations of Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. Instead, the government is going to buy bonds owned by Goldman Sachs or Wells Fargo -- bonds which, at heart, pay through to bondholders the income from millions of Americans' mortgage payments.
American taxpayers will have new obligations: in order to buy those bonds, the government is going to have to borrow hundreds of billions of dollars. That's new debt, and government debt. But there's no government guarantee on anything. And if you own a CDO or some other mortgage obligation, the government is definitively not going to step in and make sure you get paid in full.






