Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Index Funds Aren't Speculators
One of the first rules of headline writing is that you shouldn't go with anything which just sounds stupid. Like, say, this:
Speculative Bets by Index Funds Didn't Push Oil Prices Up, Report Says
Of course, the whole point of index funds is that they don't make speculative bets.
What the NYT is trying to talk about (and frankly the main story doesn't do a much better job than the headline) is the idea that commodity speculators were using index funds to bet on commodity prices rising, and that all that money flowing into those index funds was partly responsible for the increase in the price of oil. It turns out, not so much. Here's the WSJ, explaining quite clearly:
A widely anticipated study by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission also cast doubt on whether a big force blamed for pushing up oil prices this year -- investment in baskets of commodity futures, or index-linked funds -- was responsible, citing fresh data that index investors actually reduced their total bets on oil this year.
Index funds are useful and harmless creatures. They're not perfect -- no financial instrument is: they ratify high prices, for instance, because they assiduously take no position at all on whether any security might be too expensive or too cheap. But it's not a good idea to even hint that they might be speculating in anything: that one headline could, at the margin, keep a retail investor in high-priced mutual funds. Which do speculate.






