Why Infrastructure Privatization is Moving Slowly
Jenny Anderson has an evenhanded overview of US infrastructure privatization today. In a nutshell: it's necessary, but it's going to happen very slowly.
The good news is that the media is moving away from "OMG the government is selling off our public assets on the cheap" and is giving fair shrift to people (including a few state governors) who point out that there's simply no way the public sector is going to spend $1.6 trillion over the next five years on necessary infrastructure spending. If the private sector is willing to do it, either alone or in public-private partnerships, then that's a great way of moving past the current impasse.
There's also good reason to believe that the private sector can and will be more efficient than the public sector when it comes to things like building highways. As Virginia Postrel noted back in 2004:
Consider the choice between the immediate cost of building thicker roads in the first place and the long-term cost of repairing thinner roads as they wear down. An economic calculation would have suggested much thicker Interstate highways, even ignoring the cost of disrupting traffic with repairs.
But the Interstates were built relatively thin, in part because of political pressures to get the system spread everywhere as quickly as possible. Now they're wearing out, and money must go for repairs. That investment, while necessary, is inefficient and yields a relatively low return.
A private-sector consortium with a 75-year or 99-year concession to build and operate a new toll road is less likely to make the same building-thin-roads mistake than a fiscally-pressured state government keen to minimize short-term costs in an environment of falling tax revenues.
But Postrel's article also points to one reason why infrastructure privatization is likely to remain politically unpopular. Building roads has immediate and visible effects: you can suddenly get from A to B much more quickly and easily. The immediate and visible effects of maintaining roads, on the other hand, are just the traffic jams caused by construction work. And that's not something that people really want to pay for, either in tolls or in taxes.
- Finance Salaries: A Reply
- Dec 2 2008 8:07PM EST
- The Failed Subprime Clampdown
- Dec 2 2008 4:29PM EST
- Blame Citigroup's woes on the Citi-Travelers Merger
- Dec 2 2008 2:30PM EST
- Greenberg's Chutzpah
- Dec 2 2008 12:26PM EST
- Super-Seniors: The Last Word
- Dec 2 2008 12:04PM EST
- Pay Bankers Much Less
- Dec 2 2008 10:58AM EST
- Great Moments in Politics, California Edition
- Dec 2 2008 10:35AM EST
- Super-Seniors: Your Questions Answered
- Dec 2 2008 9:52AM EST
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
- Adventures in Shopping, Black Friday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 3:55PM EST
- Endowments Dump Private Equity Stakes
- Dec 1 2008 3:22PM EST
- Ignoring the Stock Market
- Dec 1 2008 1:06PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










