Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Infrastructure Privatization is Moving Slowly
Jenny Anderson has an evenhanded overview of US infrastructure privatization today. In a nutshell: it's necessary, but it's going to happen very slowly.
The good news is that the media is moving away from "OMG the government is selling off our public assets on the cheap" and is giving fair shrift to people (including a few state governors) who point out that there's simply no way the public sector is going to spend $1.6 trillion over the next five years on necessary infrastructure spending. If the private sector is willing to do it, either alone or in public-private partnerships, then that's a great way of moving past the current impasse.
There's also good reason to believe that the private sector can and will be more efficient than the public sector when it comes to things like building highways. As Virginia Postrel noted back in 2004:
Consider the choice between the immediate cost of building thicker roads in the first place and the long-term cost of repairing thinner roads as they wear down. An economic calculation would have suggested much thicker Interstate highways, even ignoring the cost of disrupting traffic with repairs.
But the Interstates were built relatively thin, in part because of political pressures to get the system spread everywhere as quickly as possible. Now they're wearing out, and money must go for repairs. That investment, while necessary, is inefficient and yields a relatively low return.
A private-sector consortium with a 75-year or 99-year concession to build and operate a new toll road is less likely to make the same building-thin-roads mistake than a fiscally-pressured state government keen to minimize short-term costs in an environment of falling tax revenues.
But Postrel's article also points to one reason why infrastructure privatization is likely to remain politically unpopular. Building roads has immediate and visible effects: you can suddenly get from A to B much more quickly and easily. The immediate and visible effects of maintaining roads, on the other hand, are just the traffic jams caused by construction work. And that's not something that people really want to pay for, either in tolls or in taxes.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





