Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Crazy Lehman Share Price
Lehman Brothers looks as though it's going to sell its asset management arm, Neuberger Berman, for a sorely-needed $10 billion or so. That's got to be good news for the stock, right? No: Lehman shares are down more than 10% today, and its credit default swaps have gapped out as well.
There's no doubt that if Lehman shares had risen today, everybody would know why. But the fact that they're down puts financial journalists into a quandary: they have to pretend that there's some reason, and the best they can do is "writedown fears".
That said, DealBook has a good post today on why selling Neuberger might be a bad idea for Lehman: it could harm the bank's credit rating, send its compensation ratios soaring, and make future cashflows almost impossible to predict (and therefore to price). "Selling the unit would be tantamount to selling a ship's anchor in the midst of a storm," says the piece, citing no one in particular.
And the "writedown fears" reason isn't as silly as it looks at first glance: Lehman's drop of $1.66 a share today is smaller than the per-share losses that the likes of Kenneth Worthington are now forecasting in the third quarter.
But my feeling is that there isn't a reason -- certainly not a nice clean easy-to-fit-into-a-headline one -- why Lehman's stock is tanking today. Sometimes stocks move and we know why. More often, stocks move and we don't know why, which doesn't stop journalists from guessing. And sometimes stocks move for no particular reason at all -- especially when they're surrounded by uncertainty, they're highly leveraged, and there's a good chance that the CEO will be out within a month.






