Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Web Features: Don't be too Ambitious
The NYT has the news, this morning: BusinessWeek is adding a feature to its website at the end of September. This is clearly meant to be a big deal: it's the product of "two years of quiet development," we're told, and it "should double BusinessWeek's traffic on the Web within two years".
I wish BusinessWeek luck. There are some good ideas lurking behind the new feature, called Business Exchange: increasing search-engine referrals, encouraging readers to get involved, making the most of user-generated content rather than relegating it to unread comments streams. But you never really know with these things: sometimes they work, sometimes they don't, and the best way to find out is to try them and see. Nothing should take "two years of quiet development": it's much better to take something basic and improve it in the wild than it is to spend years trying to perfect something behind the scenes which might not take off at all.
But big media companies are very bad when it comes to experimentation and willingness to fail. Sometimes they see someone else doing something they like and simply acquire it, like Conde Nast did with Reddit: that kind of thing can make a lot of sense. But it's much less common for them to try to grow such things in-house. That's partly because when they do try the in-house route, they end up in the same position as BusinessWeek: the project ends up taking vast amounts of time and management cycles, everybody wants their own bright ideas included, and eventually the whole thing becomes laden with monster expectations which only serve to increase the probability that it will end up disappointing.
I'm not at all convinced that BusinessWeek's professional audience really has any inclination to set up a profile page, complete with photo, which lists that person's online reading habits. Still, it's an interesting idea, and BusinessWeek's partner LinkedIn has had no little success doing something similar. So it's well worth trying out, and seeing if it sticks. It's just not worth spending huge amounts of time and money on until you know for sure that your audience has some interest in it.






