Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Supply and Demand in the Oil Market
Stan Collender just doesn't believe that the volatile oil price can really be function of old-fashioned supply and demand:
It's not that I'm not a big believer in this most basic rule of economics. It's just that the higher prices seemed to come so suddenly and the increase was so steep that it was hard to imagine that supplies had fallen and demand had increased that dramatically or unexpectedly...
Does the recent very rapid drop in the price of oil put to rest the supply and demand common wisdom on oil prices?
I think that the main thing we can learn from the recent volatility in oil prices is not that the laws of supply and demand have been broken, or that they're a function of anything else, but mainly that demand for oil is very inelastic, and that relatively small increases in demand can result in very large increases in price.
The idea behind demand curves is simple: if oil is more expensive, demand for it will fall. But as oil rose and rose and rose in price, from $10 to $30 to $50 to $80 to $120 to $140 a barrel, demand steadfastly refused to diminish. Meanwhile, supply from places like Mexico's Cantarell oil field was falling. In such a situation, you'd expect oil prices to rise an enormous amount.
Eventually, it seems, at somewhere around $140 a barrel, prices were so high that demand did start falling off. Up until then, prices were on a steady upward path: they would keep on rising until they couldn't rise any further. And in such a situation, you'd expect a bit of an overshoot, which woul explain "the recent very rapid drop in the price of oil," as well. Remember, the percentage drop in the price of oil is much smaller than the percentage rise in the price of oil which preceded it.
So count me in with the supply-and-demand True Believers. Remember that quote from an auction house specialist saying that "heaven is two Russian oligarchs bidding against each other"? In such a situation, where both individuals want the finite (=1) supply of paintings on offer, there's really no limit to how high the price can go. The oil market is similar: so long as people will pay whatever it costs to have energy, there's no cap to potential price rises. And that's exactly what's been going on of late.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





