Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
No Changes to Libor
Remember the big Libor makeover, prompted by fears that Libor was increasingly fictional? Well, now that we've all pretty much forgotten what the fuss was all about, the BBA has come out and decided to do nothing. In a 14-page paper, the BBA carefully runs down the list of all the proposed possible changes, and rejects each one.
The only proposal that got any traction at all was the idea of increasing the size of the panels -- and that ran into the entirely predictable problem that no one had any desire to join them.
I think this is probably the right decision: this is the kind of thing where you have to be very aware of the law of unintended consequences. My hope is that as the interbank market remains illiquid, especially at relatively long tenors like six months and one year, financial markets will slowly move away from 6-month and 1-year Libor as standard benchmarks. That will solve the problem, insofar as there is a problem, slowly and quietly.
Incidentally, the FT is reporting this news in a most peculiar way: "BBA to enhance Libor governance" is the headline, and the story leads with the largely cosmetic tinkering that's going on at the committee level; nowhere is it mentioned that all the possible substantive changes have been rejected. Is there a companion article about the rejection that I'm missing? Or did the FT just get this one wrong?
(HT: Alea)
