Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Bloomberg Datapoint of the Day
Back in 1985, investment-banking powerhouse Merrill Lynch bought a 30% stake in Bloomberg LP for $30 million. A few years later, Bloomberg bought back a 10% stake for $200 million, leaving Merrill with 20% -- which it's now selling, again to Bloomberg, for $4.5 billion.
Because of its financial duress, Merrill sold its stake at a discount, these people said. John A. Thain, Merrill's chief executive, valued the Bloomberg stake at $5 billion to $6 billion when he spoke at a conference last month.
Since there were no other bidders, and since this was a sale under duress, it's reasonable to assume that the real value of the 20% stake is something over $5 billion, and is quite possibly more than $5.5 billion, especially now that it has been consolidated into the principal's controlling 92% shareholding. If that's the case, then Bloomberg is now worth more than Merrill, whose market cap is $27.5 billion.
What's more, Merrill isn't even getting $4.5 billion in cash: it needs to lend that money to Bloomberg first. According to the NYT, Merrill "is providing financing for the purchase": essentially it's converted Bloomberg equity into Bloomberg debt. Still, I'm sure that under some accounting rule or other this has done wonders for Merrill's balance sheet.
