Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Central Banker Salary Datapoint of the Day
Last year, the Bank of England paid about £520,000 to Mervyn King: a salary of £290,653 and pension contributions of about £230,000. This year, King isn't eligible for pension contributions, since he's 60 years old now and that's the age at which the pension scheme deems that a person has retired. But luckily for him, this is also the year that the recommendations of a review of Bank of England salaries are being put into effect. And according to that review,
the Governor should be paid more, between £375,000 and £400,000, but receive less pension benefits.
Given that King is no longer eligible for pension benefits, that nominal pay rise constitutes, for him and his pension fund, a pay cut of about £130,000. But King has also said that accepting the salary rise would be "inappropriate". Which means he's just taking his standard 2.5% wage increase, bringing his pay this year to about £298,000: his effective pay cut is over 40%.
Of course, the real money comes not now, but later, after he retires. That's when he can start accepting lucrative consultancies and non-executive directorships which will make his present pay look positively puny. His decision to forego a £110,000 pay rise for this year, we can be sure, will have no effect on his standard of living whatsoever. In other words, the upside is significant - he gets lots of good press from the decision - while the downside, in practice, is small indeed.






