Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Central Banker Salary Datapoint of the Day
Last year, the Bank of England paid about £520,000 to Mervyn King: a salary of £290,653 and pension contributions of about £230,000. This year, King isn't eligible for pension contributions, since he's 60 years old now and that's the age at which the pension scheme deems that a person has retired. But luckily for him, this is also the year that the recommendations of a review of Bank of England salaries are being put into effect. And according to that review,
the Governor should be paid more, between £375,000 and £400,000, but receive less pension benefits.
Given that King is no longer eligible for pension benefits, that nominal pay rise constitutes, for him and his pension fund, a pay cut of about £130,000. But King has also said that accepting the salary rise would be "inappropriate". Which means he's just taking his standard 2.5% wage increase, bringing his pay this year to about £298,000: his effective pay cut is over 40%.
Of course, the real money comes not now, but later, after he retires. That's when he can start accepting lucrative consultancies and non-executive directorships which will make his present pay look positively puny. His decision to forego a £110,000 pay rise for this year, we can be sure, will have no effect on his standard of living whatsoever. In other words, the upside is significant - he gets lots of good press from the decision - while the downside, in practice, is small indeed.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





