Why Force Your CEO to be Chairman?
Gary Wilson finds an interesting bylaw in some of America's bluest blue-chip companies:
Such companies as General Electric, Coca-Cola, Exxon Mobil, UPS, Deere, Caterpillar, CSX and Johnson & Johnson actually have bylaws that require the CEO to also serve as chairman.
I've been racking my brain, and can't think of a single reason why such bylaws should be so common. It's hard enough to think why the CEO should also be chairman at the best of times, but in exceptional circumstances maybe that can genuinely be what the board thinks is best. It does seem obvious, however, that such determinations can only be made once you know who the CEO is.
The two jobs are different, after all, and require different skillsets. Is it possible that a CEO will also make a good chairman? Yes. Is it necessarily the case? No. By adopting such a bylaw, the board is tying one hand behind its back when it comes to the CEO succession process. Not only does it need to find someone who will be a good CEO -- which is hard enough -- but it needs to confine its search to people who would also make a good chairman. And that's just self-defeating.
Wilson says, reasonably enough, that combining the positions of chairman and CEO creates the "Imperial CEO". I would expect to find Imperial CEOs in young companies run by their founder, like Oracle or Whole Foods; I'm surprised to find Imperial CEOs mandated in much older companies like GE and Coca-Cola which are many generations removed from their founders.
Wilson would like stock exchanges to require that when a company names a new CEO, it must also name an "independent director" as chairman. I think that companies should do that; I'm not at all sure that it's the role of stock exchanges to force such a thing, however. But put that to one side: companies with bylaws forcing the same person to fill both roles should either abolish those bylaws, or else come up with a good reason for their continued existence. At least give the board the option to split the roles!
- Finance Salaries: A Reply
- Dec 2 2008 8:07PM EST
- The Failed Subprime Clampdown
- Dec 2 2008 4:29PM EST
- Blame Citigroup's woes on the Citi-Travelers Merger
- Dec 2 2008 2:30PM EST
- Greenberg's Chutzpah
- Dec 2 2008 12:26PM EST
- Super-Seniors: The Last Word
- Dec 2 2008 12:04PM EST
- Pay Bankers Much Less
- Dec 2 2008 10:58AM EST
- Great Moments in Politics, California Edition
- Dec 2 2008 10:35AM EST
- Super-Seniors: Your Questions Answered
- Dec 2 2008 9:52AM EST
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
- Adventures in Shopping, Black Friday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 3:55PM EST
- Endowments Dump Private Equity Stakes
- Dec 1 2008 3:22PM EST
- Ignoring the Stock Market
- Dec 1 2008 1:06PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










