Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Chart of the Day: They are the Eggmen
This is a chart of the S&P 500, priced in terms of eggs. Notes DeForest McDuff:
With the price of eggs going up 75% since 2001, one share of the S&P 500 used to buy as much as 1200 eggs and now it buys only 600 eggs. That's a 50% decline in the number of eggs your stock portfolio can buy!
There are two more serious points here. The first, from McDuff:
Investment returns matter only to the extent that you can buy more "stuff" in the future. The U.S. stock market has been slowly losing real purchasing power for almost a decade, with no signs yet of a trend reversal.
It's true that the prices of hard assets like oil, gold, and omelettes have been increasing rapidly, but this is a direct consequence of decades of underinvestment in these asset classes. If you're not thinking about investing in terms of purchasing power, then you're playing the wrong game.
The second comes from SAR:
Remember the good old days when Bush was going to privatize Social Security and we were all going to invest in the stock market and be rich forever? The S&P 500, adjusted for inflation, has lost 32% since then.
Most individual investors are in the happy situation of never needing to worry overmuch about the cost of eggs. Yes, the price of eggs might have gone up, but the price of iPhones has gone down; the official CPI is not understated, for these people.
On the other hand, if you're talking about pension plans, the calculations change a lot. Many pensions belong to working-class people without other savings, who will be counting pennies in their retirement. For these people, keeping up with the price of eggs is very important, and investing in equities over the past decade has turned out to be a pretty gruesome decision.
I'm not sure if it's possible for a pension fund to benchmark a food basket. But there are lots of fund managers out there who are responsible for the life savings and wellbeing of people who are going to spend their retirements living on low incomes. Such managers might well want to start spending less time looking at absolute returns, and more time keeping an eye on the cost of living, and how it might be hedged.






