Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Further Tales of Microhoo Incompetence
The WSJ reports today not only that some kind of Microsoft-Yahoo deal might be on again, but also that:
In mid-May -- weeks after Microsoft withdrew its bid -- Yahoo offered to sell itself to Microsoft for about $33 a share, a price Yahoo had earlier rejected, say people familiar with the talks. Microsoft rebuffed the advance.
Could this whole episode get any more Keystone Kops? Oh yes it could, the minute you read the details of exactly what happened, where it seems that more attention was paid to color signals than to price signals:
Microsoft took pains to ensure that the meeting remained a secret. It instructed Mr. Yang and his coterie of advisers to drive to the back of the building, where a woman holding a closed red umbrella would be waiting...
The two sides met at the airport, in a conference room overlooking the runway. The Yahoo camp was encouraged that Mr. Ballmer had donned a polo shirt in purple, Yahoo's color.
And could the principals here be any more delusional? Here's a description of a later meeting:
No bankers were present. Early in the discussion, Messrs. Bostock and Ballmer lamented the bankers' influence on the negotiations, with Mr. Ballmer concluding that bankers had "screwed everything up." He said that Microsoft wasn't there to reopen its bid...
Why have a meeting without bankers, in which you explicitly blame the absent bankers for screwing everything up, if you don't then try to capitalize on the bankers' absence by coming to some kind of agreement without them?
Both sides displayed astonishing amounts of incompetence in this deal, which obviously reflects badly on Microsoft and Yahoo. But there might be something else going on, too: big M&A deals in the technology space are so uncommon that to this day no one really knows how to get them done, absent a force of nature like Larry Ellison. Microsoft's new plans to bring in other partners, like Time Warner and News Corp, will only complicate things further and be even less likely to come to fruition. Simply put, there's only one conceivable winner here: Google.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





