Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Bud Board Backs Busch By Blockheadedly Blackballing Belgian Brazilians
Disappointingly, but unsurprisingly, Anheuser-Busch will reject InBev's takeover bid. Will they do so by promising shareholders much more value as an independent company? It's hard to see how they could do that while maintaining a straight face. Will they wave the patriotic flag and say they're protecting jobs in the heartland? No, that doesn't seem likely either:
In its effort to justify rejecting InBev's $65 a share bid, Anheuser-Busch is expected to announce a massive reorganization to boost profits that includes cutting more than $500 million in costs...
The reorginaztion may anger some locals and politicians in St. Louis who had been pressing Anheuser-Busch to reject the bid, in part, to save local jobs. The reorganization is expected to include scores of job cuts.
I'm not sure what "scores of job cuts" means, but even before it's officially announced there's quite obviously nothing compelling about the alternative being mooted by the Anheuser-Busch board. By forcing InBev to go hostile, all they will achieve is a lot of unhelpful fighting on the way to an inevitable conclusion. Sad.
