The Master ETF

Matthew Hougan has an interesting idea:

What would your portfolio look like if you bought the five-largest ETFs on the market and weighted them based on assets under management?

51% U.S. Equities (41% SPY, 10% QQQQ)

39% Foreign Equities (25% EFA developed markets, 14% EEM emerging markets)

10% Gold (GLD)

The costs would be just 28 basis points per year (0.28%).

But why stop at five? If you extended it to ten, the proportion in US equities would go up substantially, and five seems a very arbitrary cut-off.

Instead, just keep on going. Take all of the listed ETFs, and weight them by AUM. The result would be a much better indication of where people are really invested than a relatively narrow index like the S&P 500. There would be stocks and bonds, real estate and commodities, emerging markets and currencies - everything.

Obviously, this isn't something you could easily do at home with a Charles Schwab account. But if a financial institution offered a Master ETF along such lines, it could act as quite an attractive one-stop investment. Yes, it would suffer from the same problem that all cap-weighted indices have, of chasing bubbles - that's why gold is in the top five. But if you're OK with cap-weighted indices in general, then this could be a useful addition to the ETF space. The only problem, of course, is that if it took off, it would have to start buying shares in itself...

(Via Abnormal Returns)

Add Your Comment

Report Abuse

Archive

Categories

Links