Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Blogonomics: Romenesko
Howell Raines reports on Jim Romenesko:
Romenesko is Poynter's highest-paid nonexecutive employee, at more than $170,000 a year...
Because Romenesko is an online pioneer with old-fashioned newspaper values, he chose to do it in a nonprofit environment, but money can be made with his formula. That's why Poynter has steadily boosted his pay and why Roy Peter Clark and others at the institute are anxious that an internet giant like Microsoft, Google, or Yahoo will soon dangle a big salary in front of him to shift-key his daily bundle of nearly 100,000 unique visitors over to its website. Poynter comforts itself with the thought that Romenesko didn't found MediaGossip back in the dawn of the digital era with the idea of becoming rich. But like the rest of us, he might not mind wealth if it plopped into his lap.
The $170k figure is actually now three years old; given that Romenesko's salary more than doubled between 2000 and 2005, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Romenesko was now making more than $200k. (Rich!)
Could Romenesko earn more than that in a for-profit environment, given 100,000 monthly uniques and a readership which is, if not shrinking, at least no longer growing? I'm not at all sure. His readership is high, for a blog, but the numbers alone are not the kind of thing which will get any media company salivating. It's the demographics which are much more attractive: Romenesko reaches a huge proportion of important media insiders and influencers. But whether that reach could be effectively monetized I'm not at all sure: it would probably take a dedicated sales person to even try, and such people generally cost well over $200,000 themselves.
Of course, at any time someone might come along and offer Romenesko an enormous salary and/or equity in a new company just for prestige value alone. But as Raines points out, the prestige associted with old-school first-generation bloggers is fast evaporating: do the kids these days really know or care who Jason Kottke is?
For those of us who have been following Romenesko since his mediagossip.com days, he will always be a pioneer and a role model. But I think he has a good thing going at Poynter, and I don't think he will or should take Raines's advice to jump ship next time a rival job offer comes along.
Update: According to the nonprofit information service Guidestar, Romenesko made $170,419 as of December 2006.






