Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Chart of the Day: Oakland vs Berkeley Housing
Mike Simonsen shows us what's been happening over the past year to house prices in Oakland and Berkeley:
He puts forward a number of theories why this might be the case, but I think there's one overarching reason: Berkeley, like Manhattan, is one of the very few areas of the country where marginal house prices are set by what people are willing to pay, rather than what they are able to pay.
In Oakland, as in most of California, a would-be homebuyer goes to a mortgage shop, finds out how much money their lender is willing to extend, and then buys a house for that sum. Right now, the lenders are basically not willing to lend at all, especially if the would-be homebuyer has no downpayment, and that explains why prices have fallen off a cliff.
In Berkeley, by contrast, homebuyers are much less likely to max out their finances on a home purchase. Will they use every last penny of their savings for a downpayment? Will they take the absolute maximum loan that the bank is willing to extend them? Probably not. As a result, I'm sure there have been very few foreclosures in Berkeley, compared to Oakland, even as the demand for Berkeley housing remains unabated.
People who bought in Oakland rather than Berkeley during the housing boom, thinking they were getting a bargain, are now in a very nasty situation should they ever want to move. The old realtor's saw is being proved true: it really is only location which matters.
