Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Lehman's Slow-Motion Trainwreck Continues
Banks, by their nature, are opaque creatures, and investment banks even more so. Even when they have a public listing and aren't owned by a much larger financial-services entity, it's almost impossible to tell from outside what's going on inside them. Thus did analysts expect Lehman Brothers to report second-quarter revenue of $2.62 billion, and a net loss of 22 cents a share; the real numbers are going to be more like negative revenue of $700 million (this is investment banking, of course you can have negative revenue) and a net loss of $5.14 per share.
Even David Einhorn probably wasn't expecting numbers that bad. But there seems to be a fair few investors still willing to shovel good money into Lehman: the New Jersey Division of Investment, among others, is likely to subscribe to some $6 billion in newly-issued stock.
In the past, buying LEH when it's traded well below book value has been a way to make some spectacular profits, so you can see where the temptation lies. On the other hand, with the stock destined to open this morning significantly below the $30 level, there's a definite feeling of slow-motion trainwreck here. Still, at least the slow-motion bit is a good thing: it means that Treasury and the Fed have that much more time to find someone with credibly deep pockets willing to buy the bank outright.






