Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Lehman's Slow-Motion Trainwreck Continues
Banks, by their nature, are opaque creatures, and investment banks even more so. Even when they have a public listing and aren't owned by a much larger financial-services entity, it's almost impossible to tell from outside what's going on inside them. Thus did analysts expect Lehman Brothers to report second-quarter revenue of $2.62 billion, and a net loss of 22 cents a share; the real numbers are going to be more like negative revenue of $700 million (this is investment banking, of course you can have negative revenue) and a net loss of $5.14 per share.
Even David Einhorn probably wasn't expecting numbers that bad. But there seems to be a fair few investors still willing to shovel good money into Lehman: the New Jersey Division of Investment, among others, is likely to subscribe to some $6 billion in newly-issued stock.
In the past, buying LEH when it's traded well below book value has been a way to make some spectacular profits, so you can see where the temptation lies. On the other hand, with the stock destined to open this morning significantly below the $30 level, there's a definite feeling of slow-motion trainwreck here. Still, at least the slow-motion bit is a good thing: it means that Treasury and the Fed have that much more time to find someone with credibly deep pockets willing to buy the bank outright.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





