Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Public School vs Private School Debate
Tyler Cowen brings up one of my favorite subjects: the dollar value (as opposed to the dollar cost) of private schooling. And I'm happy he comes down on my side of a question which will never be resolved to everybody's satisfaction: public or private?
I ended up telling my mother I was happy to remain in the public school. If nothing else I feared the commuting costs and not having friends' homes be nearby. Furthermore at public school I met Randall Kroszner and Daniel Klein, among other notables. Natasha and I faced this choice again with Yana and she ended up in public high school. I can't really cite economics here but if your public school is halfway decent that is the side I come down on.
Insofar as there's been much empirical research on this, it generally shows that, after adjusting for socio-economic status, there's very little difference in educational outcomes between public schools and private schools. Given that fact, it makes sense to take the money that would otherwise be spent on private schools, and to spend it instead on other forms of education: books, travel, opera, you name it.
One of Cowen's commenters hilariously then adds on the "time cost of parental involvement," as though these are the kind of things most middle-class parents wouldn't love to do.
So while Tim Harford might concentrate on the marginal benefits of sending your kids to a private school - peer effects, mainly, and probably-better teachers - he doesn't spend nearly as much time considering the marginal costs, which are huge. Stop to ask yourself how much pre-tax income you would need to send two children to private school through age 18, and then ask yourself how much happier you would be if you didn't need to earn all that money, or if you could spend that money on other things instead.
Yes, teachers are important, but parents are even more important. And middle-class parents of kids in public schools have, at the margin, more time and more money to spend on their kids. Which, I suspect, more than makes up for any pedagogic weaknesses at the public school they send their children to.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




