Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why is Harvard Economics so Popular?
Brad DeLong doesn't think much of the Harvard economics department as a place for undergraduates:
My years as a junior faculty member and as head tutor of economics make me think that there is an enormous disproportion between resource inputs and educational outputs.
David Warsh says that other Harvard academics don't think much of it, either:
The economics department, eager to be known as the world's foremost in order to attract the brightest students, remains in bad odor within the university.
And yet, says Jeffrey Miron:
Economics is the largest undergraduate concentration, accounting for more than 15 percent of the senior class... Economics has been one of the largest concentrations, if not the largest, for many decades.
What's going on here? Partly I suspect there's a big difference between Harvard economics as it's judged internally, and Harvard economics as it's judged externally by people who have not been to Harvard and quite possibly have never studied ecomomics.
But mainly, I think, it's this:
Many economics graduates land starting salaries in six figures.
Is that really true? Kids with nothing but an undergrad degree in economics, not even an MBA, getting six-figure starting salaries? If it is, that's more tnan enough explanation right there.
Update: DeLong damns clarifies with faint praise in the comments: the education that undergrads receive from Harvard economics is, he says, "not bad".






