Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Marking to Last Year's Market, Charity Ball Edition
In the very first issue of Portfolio, last year, Tom Wolfe reported on the annual charity ball held by the Robin Hood foundation. After listing the excesses of the auction (ten "power meals" for $650,000; a "five-day "Surf and Sun" trip" for $240,000), he got to the bottom line: "an astounding $48 million" was raised for charity over the course of the evening.
Wolfe, however, was referring to the 2006 event. In 2008, things are different:
Giving away $56.5 million in a night would strike most people as extravagant. But to the tycoons of modern finance, it seems a bit low key.
At the 2008 Robin Hood Foundation benefit this week, auctiongoers donated that much money to charity. But many of the market wizards are making less these days -- and they are giving away less, too. Robin Hood's haul was down 21 percent from last year.
Thus are expectations changed: the 2008 haul was up 18% on the amount raised in 2006. But because it's down on the ridiculous amounts of money being thrown around in 2007, it's now considered "a bit low key", and reflective of "the somber mood on Wall Street."
I'm in London this week (which is one reason I'm not posting as much as normal) and I've noticed a similar phenomenon regarding house prices. People are worried about falling prices and gazundering, to the point at which they seemingly forget that they're still selling their house for a lot more money than they bought it for.
Call it mark-to-market gone viral. If you're an investment bank or a fund manager, it makes sense to mark your positions every day to their market value. But if you're a homeowner, there's not much point in doing so - certainly not unless you're borrowing more against the increased value of your house. If you're not taking out home equity lines, then obsessing about whether your house is worth more or less than it was a few months ago is rather silly and pointless.
Similarly, a charity ball which raises $56.5 million over the course of an evening is an extremely impressive event. Even if it did raise more than that last year.






