Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why GE's Selling its Appliances Division
GE looks as though it'll sell off its appliances business, and John Gapper wonders
why GE is not prepared to invest enough in the business to turn it into a global powerhouse when it clearly expects someone else to buy it for that reason.
I think the answer is the same as the reason why CBS bought CNet: publicly-listed companies, be they CBS or GE, feel the need to show impressive growth rates, not just in revenues but also in earnings.
A large investment in the GE appliances brand would certainly be expensive; it would also have a relatively low return even if it were successful, because appliances, even when you're a global powerhouse, are a pretty low-margin business.
Haier, of China, by contrast, doesn't have the same pressure from shareholders that GE has. It's perfectly happy to slowly and steadily build a global brand, and it's exported so much over the past few years that has lots of dollars to spend doing so.
The hardest nut to crack if you're trying to build a global brand, of course, is always the USA, so buying GE's appliances business would give Haier a very strong competitive footing against the likes of Korea's LG - and it could get that position overnight, rather than having to build it organically like LG has done.
Meanwhile, GE can take the proceeds from the sale and invest them (if all goes according to plan) at an IRR well above anything Haier might require. Everybody's happy - except, as Gapper notes, the GE Appliances brass in Louisville.






