Sign In
SHARE
Why GE's Selling its Appliances Division
GE looks as though it'll sell off its appliances business, and John Gapper wonders
why GE is not prepared to invest enough in the business to turn it into a global powerhouse when it clearly expects someone else to buy it for that reason.
I think the answer is the same as the reason why CBS bought CNet: publicly-listed companies, be they CBS or GE, feel the need to show impressive growth rates, not just in revenues but also in earnings.
A large investment in the GE appliances brand would certainly be expensive; it would also have a relatively low return even if it were successful, because appliances, even when you're a global powerhouse, are a pretty low-margin business.
Haier, of China, by contrast, doesn't have the same pressure from shareholders that GE has. It's perfectly happy to slowly and steadily build a global brand, and it's exported so much over the past few years that has lots of dollars to spend doing so.
The hardest nut to crack if you're trying to build a global brand, of course, is always the USA, so buying GE's appliances business would give Haier a very strong competitive footing against the likes of Korea's LG - and it could get that position overnight, rather than having to build it organically like LG has done.
Meanwhile, GE can take the proceeds from the sale and invest them (if all goes according to plan) at an IRR well above anything Haier might require. Everybody's happy - except, as Gapper notes, the GE Appliances brass in Louisville.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak
- Financial Crookery
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Marginal Revolution
- The Panelist
- FP Passport
- Overcoming Bias
- Andrew Leonard
- Barry Ritholtz
- Brad Setser
- Carbon Tax Center
- Calculated Risk
- Greg Mankiw
- Free Exchange
- Dean Baker
- Alexander Campbell
- Kash Mansori
- The Bayesian Heresy
- A Fistful of Euros
- John Quiggin
- Michael Mandel
- Lance Knobel
- Mark Thoma
- Dan Gross
- Curbed
- Streetsblog
- Chris Anderson
- Deal Journal
- MarketBeat
- DealBook
- DealBreaker
- Carl Bialik
- Michelle Leder
- Brad DeLong
- Ultimi Barbarorum
