Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Berkshire Hathaway Should Buy CBS
Evan Newmark has a very smart take on CBS's acquisition of CNet. The main problem with CBS, he says, is that it's a profitable but slow-growth company saddled with a public listing. Since no public company CEO is happy mapping out a future of slow yet profitable growth, Les Moonves feels forced to do silly things like pay 22x Ebitda for CNet when his own company is trading on a ratio of less than 8x.
Here is Les Moonves, "As you know, we're always looking for strategic acquisitions in higher growth businesses." And I thought, why? The business you're in is pretty good at generating cash.
Newmark concludes:
The popularity of public companies going private over the last decade makes a lot of sense in this light. It can be viewed as the only way of saving a public company from its own growth-at-all-costs impulses.
But I'm not sure that CBS would make such a great private-equity target. As Newmark himself says, the private-equity playbook wouldn't go down very well:
To continue to create shareholder value, you must have both of these constituencies come along with you. Do you cut costs and investments and pay out as much cash as you can? No, of course not. Employees, creative talent and advertisers would run from the company.
On the other hand, CBS would be a great acquisition for Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire doesn't necessarily look for growth in the businesses it buys: it looks for cashflow, which it can profitably reinvest elsewhere. And CBS has lots of profits which Berkshire would love to be able to invest. It's like See's Candies: acompany which throws of lots of cash and has perennial appeal to Middle America.
When Berkshire acquires a company, it generally leaves management alone to run that company. The one thing it doesn't do is push management to make "strategic acquisitions in higher growth businesses". CBS is perfect for that kind of oversight. And with the shares only just coming off their all-time lows (admittedly, all-time isn't very long, CBS was only spun off from Viacom in 2006), shareholders might welcome a face-saving exit.
