Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

False Positives at Blogger
What's going on with Blogger? Both Yves Smith and Brad DeLong have run into problems of late, and I have a nasty feeling that it's an unloved orphan stepchild within Google, and that it's likely to continue to deteriorate further and lose market share to nicer, cleaner, friendlier alternatives like Wordpress and Tumblr.
At the end of April, Naked Capitalism had some nasty tech woes: Google/Blogger determined somehow that the blog was a spam blog, prevented Yves Smith from posting any new entries, and made it very difficult for her to persuade them in a timely fashion that the blog was for real. The weirdness there was twofold: on the one hand Google owns Feedburner, and the number of Feedburner subscriptions alone should have been an indication that the blog was not spam. And what's more, Google was happy keeping the site up; it merely prevented the posting of any new entries. If the blog was spam, it's far from clear what such actions would achieve.
Now, Brad DeLong is being prevented from even viewing Abu Muqawama, on the grounds that he "looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application". (Maybe he hadn't had enough of his morning coffee that day, or maybe he'd had too much?)
False positives are always a problem in any attempt to fight spambots and viruses and the like, but the Blogger/Google response seems far too heavy-handed to me. It's increasingly hard to prove you're a human these days, but they shouldn't make it impossible.
For what it's worth, this is the official statement I got from a Google spokesperson when I asked them about Yves Smith's Blogger troubles:
We think blog spam is a serious problem and we have spam detection software to try to eliminate it. We're aware that false-positive matches sometimes happen, and when they do, we have a process in place so that we can quickly review a blog that has been marked as spam. If we determine that the blog is not spam, we work to quickly restore the blog. We're always innovating to improve our products and services and are working on making this process even better in the future.
As for FeedBurner, we have a lot of ideas for how to incorporate other content authority signals into blog spam detection, but we don't have anything specific to announce at this time.
I guess it's inevitable that when a company grows to be as big as Google now is, it will revert to this kind of overlawyered corporate-speak. Is that evil? Maybe not, but it's a step in the wrong direction.






