Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

When States Pass Laws the Banks Don't Like
In many countries there aren't any long-term mortgages, either because local law makes it difficult to foreclose on a house, or else because of the very real risk that local laws will change and make it difficult to foreclose on a house. The latter is essentially legislation risk, and it's something that every bank needs to be aware of.
Unfortunately, US banks seem to have forgotten all about legislation risk, until now. It turns out that foreclosure law is set by the states, not by the federal government - and that a number of states are talking about passing laws which will make it very hard for banks to foreclose on properties.
The banks don't like this, of course. But they're bound by state law on such matters, and there isn't any federal foreclosure law, so they're taking their lumps with equanimity they've decided that they're going to try to rewrite the law on the fly.
There's this wonderful doctrine called pre-emption, you see, which is used by national credit-card companies and which says that nationally-regulated banks don't need to worry about state laws, they can just answer to federal regulators and obey federal rules. So the banks' latest bright idea is that they can do the same thing with foreclosure, even though there aren't any federal foreclosure rules or regulations.
Of course, this would apply only to nationally-chartered banks. But any local bank wanting to foreclose could simply sell its broken loan to a national bank and get around the state laws that way. Essentially, all state foreclosure laws would be rendered toothless overnight if banks successfully pre-empt state laws.
Fortunately, a pair of Congressmen - Brad Miller (D, NC) and Steve LaTourette (R, OH) - are introducing a bill which will stop the pre-emption racket. As Elizabeth Warren puts it:
If banks don't like the state laws, they remain free to fight them in the state legislatures or the state courts. They can even make constitutional arguments about takings. But congressmen Miller and LaTourette say they can't claim that Congress gave them a free pass.
There's really no reason why national banks should have more free rein to foreclose than local banks, in any state. So with luck the Miller-LaTourette bill will pass. But expect the vote to be close: the financial services industry has a lot of clout in Washington.






