Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Why Sotheby's Borrowers Aren't Speculators
Floyd Norris, meet Nouriel Roubini. Both of you are worried about consumer credit in non-housing parts of the economy: Nouriel is concerned about auto loans, while Floyd is looking at art loans, and specifically the $835 million that Sotheby's lent to buyers last year:
Buying art on credit is, in essense, a bet that the price will appreciate at a faster rate than the interest is accumulating. That sounds like speculation to me.
Both Floyd and Nouriel have, I think, been spending too much time in the world of high finance. What we're talking about here, in both cases, is essentially very simple: vendor finance which enables an individual to buy an item he wants.
If you're buying a big-ticket item like a car or a painting, there's a good chance that you don't have the cash to pay for it just lying around. So you end up choosing one of two alternatives: either you sell other assets in order to raise the money, or else you pay for it out of future earnings. Car loans are a way of financing the latter; Sotheby's loans to buyers are a way of financing the former.
This is emphatically not speculation. If an individual buys a painting using Sotheby's credit, he's not betting that he'll be able to flip it before he has to pay the auction house back. If he is, he's being stupid, because of the auction-house fees involved: he has to cover not only the interest that Sotheby's is charging him, but also the large buyer's premium he paid on top of the hamer price.
Rather, he might have a lot of money tied up in hedge funds, in his own company, or in other illiquid investments, and Sotheby's is giving him time to raise cash either by selling or by borrowing against those investments.
If I own a large stake in a multi-billion-dollar corporation, I'm a good credit, and Sotheby's is going to be perfectly comfortable lending me money to buy a painting, even if I don't have a few million dollars in ready cash. Such a transaction might "sound like speculation" to Floyd Norris, but it isn't even close to that.
