Why Sotheby's Borrowers Aren't Speculators
Floyd Norris, meet Nouriel Roubini. Both of you are worried about consumer credit in non-housing parts of the economy: Nouriel is concerned about auto loans, while Floyd is looking at art loans, and specifically the $835 million that Sotheby's lent to buyers last year:
Buying art on credit is, in essense, a bet that the price will appreciate at a faster rate than the interest is accumulating. That sounds like speculation to me.
Both Floyd and Nouriel have, I think, been spending too much time in the world of high finance. What we're talking about here, in both cases, is essentially very simple: vendor finance which enables an individual to buy an item he wants.
If you're buying a big-ticket item like a car or a painting, there's a good chance that you don't have the cash to pay for it just lying around. So you end up choosing one of two alternatives: either you sell other assets in order to raise the money, or else you pay for it out of future earnings. Car loans are a way of financing the latter; Sotheby's loans to buyers are a way of financing the former.
This is emphatically not speculation. If an individual buys a painting using Sotheby's credit, he's not betting that he'll be able to flip it before he has to pay the auction house back. If he is, he's being stupid, because of the auction-house fees involved: he has to cover not only the interest that Sotheby's is charging him, but also the large buyer's premium he paid on top of the hamer price.
Rather, he might have a lot of money tied up in hedge funds, in his own company, or in other illiquid investments, and Sotheby's is giving him time to raise cash either by selling or by borrowing against those investments.
If I own a large stake in a multi-billion-dollar corporation, I'm a good credit, and Sotheby's is going to be perfectly comfortable lending me money to buy a painting, even if I don't have a few million dollars in ready cash. Such a transaction might "sound like speculation" to Floyd Norris, but it isn't even close to that.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak

- Financial Crookery

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- Ultimi Barbarorum







