Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Is Bank of America Rethinking Countrywide's Value?
At some point, whenever somebody is trying to value a financial institution, a term like "tangible equity" or "book value" will start being thrown around. They're different ways of playing the assets-minus-liabilities game, but that's where the problems start: if the financial institution is in trouble, then its liabilities are worth less, which can mean that it actually rises in value.
So what's happening with Countrywide, now that Bank of America has said that it won't guarantee the mortgage lender's liabilities? Are these kind of calculations being made? Reuters has seen a report from Friedman Billings analyst Paul Miller, but isn't exactly crystal clear on what he's saying:
Countrywide's loan portfolio has deteriorated so rapidly that it currently has negative equity and the proposed takeover of the company will be a drag on Bank of America's earnings due to the elevated credit expenses at Countrywide, analyst Paul Miller wrote in a note to clients...
If mark-downs on Countrywide's loan portfolio are less than $22 billion, then Bank of America can likely offset the adjustments with fair value debt adjustments and the difference between tangible equity and its purchase price of Countrywide, he estimated.
Don't look to Dealbook to translate that into English, they just copy-and-paste it. But one way of reading it is to say that if Bank of America marks down Countrywide's assets, they can mark down the value of Countrywide's liabilities as well and still manage to justify paying money for an insolvent company. The problem of course is that once Bank of America ends up buying Countrywide, it will have every incentive to minimize Countrywide's borrowing costs, which would mean guaranteeing Countrywide's liabilities.
In any case, Miller's now saying that BofA is likely to end up paying rather less than the $6.50 or so that it originally said it would pay for Countrywide, and might bring its bid down to less than $2 per share. Which is within its rights: BofA always had more of a call option on Countrywide than a cast-iron commitment to buy it.






