Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Steve Ballmer, Fence-Sitter
The WSJ is reporting that Microsoft's board, having met to decide what to do about the Yahoo bid, has decided, um, not to decide what to do about the Yahoo bid. Instead it's punting the decision back to Steve Ballmer, who is himself not entirely sure what to do:
The apparent indecision partly reflects Mr. Ballmer's personality, say people familiar with his thinking. He can be unpredictable and at times swayed by new information, say his friends and Microsoft colleagues.
Being swayed by new information, it goes without saying, is a good thing. But it's unclear how much new information there really has been since Microsoft announced its bid. If there was a strategy which made sense then, what new information might be able to alter that strategy now?
This is very much a test of leadership for Ballmer, and so far he's failing. If you make a hostile takeover bid and then fail to follow through aggressively, your stakeholders are going to start feeling that you're not quite up to the job. Although I have to admit that it's hard to think of anyone really qualified to run Microsoft right now. The present leadership was very aggressive during the company's high-growth period, but hasn't shown itself good at running a mature company; but it would take more than a change of CEO to really change the culture in Redmond.
