Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Should CFOs be Economic Pundits?
Kevin Kelleher, like me, listened to the Apple conference call yesterday. Both of us picked up on this exchange:
Mike Abramsky - RBC Capital Markets
And then final question, you haven't said anything in your call about economic headwinds. It's obviously something people are focusing on. It seems you are benefiting from resistance to some of those headwinds and also share gains. Any commentary you can offer in addition to the comments you've made that help us understand some of the kind of sustained drivers of that?
Peter Oppenheimer (Apple CFO)
We are going to leave economic commentary to others and we are focused on managing our business, which performed exceptionally well in the March quarter, and I credit it to just outstanding innovative products that drove amazing results.
I found Oppenheimer's response to be quite refreshing. Often investors and economists interested in the big picture are interested in what CFOs have to say about the economy, because those CFOs see how their customers are really behaving on a day-to-day basis. But CFOs are not economists, and when they start talking in vague terms about generalized economic slowdowns, it always sounds a bit like they're making excuses.
It's not Oppenheimer's job to prognosticate on the economy; if investors think that a recession will hurt Apple's sales, then they should reflect that view in terms of where they're willing to buy the stock, and of course the stock price is not something which CFOs should spend much if any time talking about.
Kelleher's view, however, is different:
Analysts tried to wring more data from Apple C.F.O. Peter Oppenheimer on the conference call with little result beyond some prickly responses. When one asked a question common on earnings calls these days--any thoughts on the overall economy?--Apple executives sniffed that they're not in the business of economic commentary.
Maybe, in economic times like this, good investor-relations protocol requires that CFOs pretend to be economists. But I'm still happy when they don't.






