Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Semiotics of Stock Tickers
Living in New York, one sees stock tickers quite often - crawling along the bottom of a TV screen, scrolling around a building in midtown, even crowning the burger flippers at the McDonalds at 160 Broadway. What are they for?
One theory has it that people find stock tickers genuinely and intrinsically useful. You can be watching TV or eating your burger, and find out that INTC is +1.10 on the day. Hey! Nice little datapoint! But really, I can't quite get my mind around the idea that enough people really care about what a more-or-less random selection of individual stocks is doing on an intraday basis. And if New Yorkers cared, you might expect to see stock tickers in other financial centers, too - but they're much rarer outside NYC.
So my theory is that the main purpose of a stock ticker is not to impart information, so much as to send a very New York kind of message. A stock ticker is up-to-the-minute! It's for people who are on the ball! It's for strivers and sophisticates! Someone watching a ticker has the opportunity to congratulate himself on being in the kind of place where people watch stock tickers, and that makes him feel good.
Then again, I might be entirely wrong about this, and there might be some functional purpose to stock tickers which people like myself who don't even have television simply don't understand. I'm not talking about customized tickers on one's computer: I'm talking about the big public tickers which purport to have a large audience. Is there something I'm missing here? Is there actually a reason for their continued existence? Or are they just relics of a pre-internet age when people really couldn't get stock prices any other way?






