Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
JP Morgan: $6 Billion Capital Raising is "Routine"
Joe Giannone managed to get someone at JP Morgan to try to explain what on earth is going on with their $6 billion issue of preferred stock:
The bank declined to comment on the transaction, but our sources at JPMorgan said the bond sale was routine, one of more than a hundred such deals over the past decade. Moreover SEC rules prevent banks from disclosing material information in the days ahead of an earnings announcement.
Besides, the source said, bond buyers all over the market knew a deal was in the works and proved to be very hungry for the paper, which was structured so that common shareholders will not see their share of profits diluted.
This is utterly unconvincing. Taking the points one at a time:
- A $6 billion capital raise is not "routine". If JP Morgan had done a hundred such deals it would have raised, um, $600 billion. Which I'm quite sure it hasn't.
- You can't disclose material information ahead of an earnings announcement? That's because you're meant to disclose material information in your earnings announcement, or at least on the conference call afterwards. Once the earnings are out, there's no SEC constraints. Why didn't JPM say anything yesterday, after the earnings were out? And why are they still declining to comment?
- If "bond buyers all over the market knew a deal was in the works," doesn't that mean that they were in possession of material information, ahead of the earnings announcement?
- And while it's true that shareholders won't see their share of profits diluted, it's also true that total profits will now be about $500 million a year lower thanks to the interest payments on this new debt. JP Morgan's earnings were $2.37 billion in the first quarter, so that kind of money is hardly immaterial.
JP Morgan's shares opened at $44.34 this morning, erasing 22% of the gains they made on Wednesday. Since then they've risen, but it's not completely outlandish to suppose that some investors were spooked by the capital raise.
In general I think it's a great idea for banks to raise capital in this environment, especially when their derivatives exposure is as large as JP Morgan's is. But I also think it's a great idea to do so transparently.
