JP Morgan: $6 Billion Capital Raising is "Routine"
Joe Giannone managed to get someone at JP Morgan to try to explain what on earth is going on with their $6 billion issue of preferred stock:
The bank declined to comment on the transaction, but our sources at JPMorgan said the bond sale was routine, one of more than a hundred such deals over the past decade. Moreover SEC rules prevent banks from disclosing material information in the days ahead of an earnings announcement.
Besides, the source said, bond buyers all over the market knew a deal was in the works and proved to be very hungry for the paper, which was structured so that common shareholders will not see their share of profits diluted.
This is utterly unconvincing. Taking the points one at a time:
- A $6 billion capital raise is not "routine". If JP Morgan had done a hundred such deals it would have raised, um, $600 billion. Which I'm quite sure it hasn't.
- You can't disclose material information ahead of an earnings announcement? That's because you're meant to disclose material information in your earnings announcement, or at least on the conference call afterwards. Once the earnings are out, there's no SEC constraints. Why didn't JPM say anything yesterday, after the earnings were out? And why are they still declining to comment?
- If "bond buyers all over the market knew a deal was in the works," doesn't that mean that they were in possession of material information, ahead of the earnings announcement?
- And while it's true that shareholders won't see their share of profits diluted, it's also true that total profits will now be about $500 million a year lower thanks to the interest payments on this new debt. JP Morgan's earnings were $2.37 billion in the first quarter, so that kind of money is hardly immaterial.
JP Morgan's shares opened at $44.34 this morning, erasing 22% of the gains they made on Wednesday. Since then they've risen, but it's not completely outlandish to suppose that some investors were spooked by the capital raise.
In general I think it's a great idea for banks to raise capital in this environment, especially when their derivatives exposure is as large as JP Morgan's is. But I also think it's a great idea to do so transparently.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
- Apr 27 2009 9:26AM EDT
- Sinking Animal Spirits
- Apr 27 2009 8:45AM EDT
- Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
- Apr 26 2009 10:00AM EDT
- Be Your Own Counterfeiter
- Apr 26 2009 9:36AM EDT
- Being Tim Geithner
- Apr 25 2009 12:37PM EDT
- Notes From a Press Conference Naif
- Apr 25 2009 9:41AM EDT
- What Good is the News?
- Apr 25 2009 8:32AM EDT
- Stressful Enough
- Apr 24 2009 2:29PM EDT
- Not Regretting the Pound
- Apr 24 2009 1:09PM EDT
- Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
- Apr 24 2009 9:47AM EDT
- Non-Economic Questions of the Day
- Apr 24 2009 9:12AM EDT
- The Stress Test Blind Alley
- Apr 24 2009 8:36AM EDT
- Happy Hour
- Apr 23 2009 9:40PM EDT
- Recovery Without Rebalancing
- Apr 23 2009 6:13PM EDT
- The Shape of Your Recession
- Apr 23 2009 5:11PM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email Ryan Avent
- Econospeak

- Financial Crookery

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- Ultimi Barbarorum







