Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Private Equity Debt Buybacks: A Second Bite at the Cherry?
Here's one for Dear John Thain or anybody else wondering about what happens when a private-equity shop buys the debt of its own portfolio companies. Let's say that the portfolio company in question goes bankrupt, and is taken over by its creditors - who are an arm of the very same private equity company who owned it in the first place. Management stays in place, and the fees remitted back to the private-equity company remain. But at the limited-partner level there's a world of difference: the first set of equity investors is wiped out, while the second set of debt investors ends up with all the equity upside.
At the general-partner level, you can see how this might be attractive. With valuations falling through the floor, the chances of getting back to breakeven on the equity are slim, and that 20% performance fee is a chimera. But as soon as the debt is converted to equity, it's entirely possible that the debt-fund limited partnership will make profits, and that the general partners will be able to skim off their 20%. It's a bit like those companies which reprice their CEO's options when the stock price falls: the people in charge get a second bite at the cherry.
Do I think this is going to happen? No, not really. But is there any reason why it can't?






