Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Iceland: Victimized by its Tiny Currency
Jim Surowiecki has a good piece on Iceland this week. "When we look at Iceland's predicament," he says, "we should say that there but for the grace of China go we."
It's a good point. If Iceland risks becoming the Bear Stearns of the North Atlantic, then America is the Citigroup: too big to fail.
I do differ with Surowiecki on one thing, though. He says that the troubles currently besetting Iceland are a direct consequence of the subprime crisis and the ongoing credit crunch. In a narrow sense, that's true, but looking at the bigger picture Iceland has always had a very fragile economy. And the main reason is its insistence on having an independent, free-floating currency.
Iceland is the smallest economy in the world to have a floating currency. And floating currencies are dangerous to have: they're by definition at the mercy of international currency speculators, with their trillions of dollars in daily flows. Iceland, in particular, has seen the value of its currency set not by any real fundamentals so much as by the mechanics of the notorious carry trade, where hedge funds borrow money in Swiss francs or yen, and invest it in high-yielding currencies like the Icelandic króna or the Brazilian real.
In strong years, this is good for Iceland: it means that Icelandic companies, including its banks, can snap up northern European retailers and financial institutions at attractive prices. But when the carry trade is unwound - and it always unwinds with a snap, never gradually - then Iceland is forced to implement extremely unpleasant pro-cyclical monetary policies to avert financial disaster.
Did Iceland borrow too much from abroad, as Surowiecki asserts? Yes. But if it had adopted the euro before doing so, it wouldn't have its current problems. Of course, Iceland isn't even in the EU, let alone close to becoming a formal member of the eurozone. But as Willem Buiter reminds us, you don't need to be in the EU to adopt the euro. Maybe this present crisis might force Iceland's population to start thinking the unthinkable.






