Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Parsing the Global Recession
We all know what a recession is: two consecutive quarters of negative growth. Easy. So a global recession, that's the same thing, but on a global level, right? Actually, no. Recessions happen, in all countries, but they don't happen in all countries simultaneously, and it's pretty much impossible for the entire world to register negative growth in any given quarter.
So don't be too alarmed when the likes of Andrew Leonard say things like this (italics his):
Today, the International Monetary Fund conceded that there is now a 1-in-4 chance of a global recession occurring in the next 12 months.
The problem here is that he's not defining his terms. And if you look at the actual document, you'll see that the IMF's definition of a "global recession" is global growth of 3% or less. Which suddenly seems much less scary. After all, with the population of the world at 6.6 billion and growing at 77 million per year, that's a population growth rate of about 1.2%, and 3% growth globally corresponds to significantly positive growth not only on a nominal basis but also on a per capita basis. You can call it a recession if you like, but it's not really the same animal as what we're talking about here in the US.






