Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Parsing the Global Recession
We all know what a recession is: two consecutive quarters of negative growth. Easy. So a global recession, that's the same thing, but on a global level, right? Actually, no. Recessions happen, in all countries, but they don't happen in all countries simultaneously, and it's pretty much impossible for the entire world to register negative growth in any given quarter.
So don't be too alarmed when the likes of Andrew Leonard say things like this (italics his):
Today, the International Monetary Fund conceded that there is now a 1-in-4 chance of a global recession occurring in the next 12 months.
The problem here is that he's not defining his terms. And if you look at the actual document, you'll see that the IMF's definition of a "global recession" is global growth of 3% or less. Which suddenly seems much less scary. After all, with the population of the world at 6.6 billion and growing at 77 million per year, that's a population growth rate of about 1.2%, and 3% growth globally corresponds to significantly positive growth not only on a nominal basis but also on a per capita basis. You can call it a recession if you like, but it's not really the same animal as what we're talking about here in the US.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





