Which Taleb is Right?
Pablo Triana today wades back in to the Black-Scholes debate, and takes aim at Michael Lewis:
Black-Scholes has been blamed in certain quarters for the subprime crisis. Essentially, the argument is that those blinded by the dictates of the model took too many risks too eagerly (and cheaply)...
In fact, Black-Scholes may not be used that much in the markets to begin with. New research by veteran traders and best-selling authors Nassim Taleb and Espen Haug points in that direction. Clearly, a formula that isn't used can't have much of an effect on markets, let alone cause the massacre that began last summer.
This is much the same point as I was making after the Lewis piece came out. But in a comment on that blog entry, Nassim Taleb himself sides with Lewis. So who's right? Triana's view of what Taleb is saying, or Taleb's own view of what Taleb is saying?
I think there might be less conflict here than meets the eye. Taleb's defense of Lewis's thesis is basically that Lewis uses the term "Black Scholes" not to refer to the Black-Scholes theorem itself, but rather to portfolio theory more generally, and the CAPM model as a whole. In the narrow sense, then, Triana's Taleb is right. And in the broader sense, I think that Taleb and Lewis have a bit of work to do if they're to persuade me that CAPM (and, by extension, Black Scholes) is to blame for the housing bubble, the subprime crisis, and the present credit crunch.
The way I see it, the debt bubble was much more the result of an old-fashioned search for yield than it was the result of a new-fangled search for "alpha". Did bankers and investors fool themselves by plugging low volatility numbers into their models in order to boost their risk-adjusted returns? Undoubtedly. But the connection between those models, on the one hand, and Black-Scholes, on the other, is tenuous at best, as Triana shows. After all, CAPM has been around a long time; it can't have been that disastrous, given the amount that markets have risen over the course of its existence.
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
- Adventures in Shopping, Black Friday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 3:55PM EST
- Endowments Dump Private Equity Stakes
- Dec 1 2008 3:22PM EST
- Ignoring the Stock Market
- Dec 1 2008 1:06PM EST
- When Mutual Funds Reopen for Business
- Dec 1 2008 11:50AM EST
- Credit Card Crunch
- Dec 1 2008 11:32AM EST
- Art: The Case of Ana Tzarev
- Dec 1 2008 10:13AM EST
- Tanta, RIP
- Dec 1 2008 1:24AM EST
- Extra Credit, Sunday Edition
- Nov 30 2008 11:29PM EST
- Geithner isn't Rubin
- Nov 30 2008 12:46PM EST
- Ben Stein Watch: November 30, 2008
- Nov 29 2008 11:22PM EST
- Rubin's Teflon Finally Wears Off
- Nov 29 2008 3:11PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










