Why JP Morgan Asked for a Fed Exemption
If JP Morgan Chase was so confident that it will "remain well capitalized" in the wake of the Bear Stearns acquisition, why did it go to the extraordinary length of asking the Fed to exempt it (or at least $400 billion of its newly-acquired assets) from perfectly normal capital-adequacy guidelines? I think maybe part of the answer comes today, with news that Washington Mutual is getting a $5 billion cash infusion from TPG:
WaMu's latest plan would likely eliminate, at least for now, the potential that the thrift will be acquired by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. or another large financial institution. J.P. Morgan executives have been poring over WaMu's books since March and made a preliminary offer, but discussions between the two firms ground to a halt last week, according to a person familiar with the situation.
Clearly talks between JPM and WaMu have been going on since before JPM was asked to gallop to Bear's rescue - and it would make sense that Jamie Dimon, who held all the aces in the Bear negotiation, would want to be able to have his cake (Bear Stearns) and eat it too (WaMu).
Still, I'm not a fan of this exemption. Probably the Fed had little choice but to grant it, and if you are going to make such exemptions then the one time you could conceivably justify it is during a time of extreme market stress when you're busy trying to prevent a systemic meltdown. But when you're dealing with one of the three US commercial-banking behemoths (BofA, Citi, JPMC), the capital-adequacy requirements are crucial, because the moral hazard considerations are always front-and-center.
It's more or less inconceivable that the Fed would ever allow any of those institutions to default on their debt - which means that there's trillions of dollars' worth of obligations outstanding from those three banks alone which carry an implicit US government guarantee. In that situation, it makes sense for capital requirements to be policed much more stringently at JPMC than they are normally - rather than happily loosening them, as happened here.
(HT: Alea)
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
- Adventures in Shopping, Black Friday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 3:55PM EST
- Endowments Dump Private Equity Stakes
- Dec 1 2008 3:22PM EST
- Ignoring the Stock Market
- Dec 1 2008 1:06PM EST
- When Mutual Funds Reopen for Business
- Dec 1 2008 11:50AM EST
- Credit Card Crunch
- Dec 1 2008 11:32AM EST
- Art: The Case of Ana Tzarev
- Dec 1 2008 10:13AM EST
- Tanta, RIP
- Dec 1 2008 1:24AM EST
- Extra Credit, Sunday Edition
- Nov 30 2008 11:29PM EST
- Geithner isn't Rubin
- Nov 30 2008 12:46PM EST
- Ben Stein Watch: November 30, 2008
- Nov 29 2008 11:22PM EST
- Rubin's Teflon Finally Wears Off
- Nov 29 2008 3:11PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










