BizJournals Portfolio
Home >   Business Views, Opinions and Blogs >   Business Blogs >   Market Movers >  

Why Did Jp Morgan Need The Feds Guarantee

Market Movers

by Felix Salmon
Main
Which CEO to Blame for Citi's Woes?   It's Not the Fault of Hedge Fund Managers That They Make So Much Money

Recent Blog Posts

Links

Apr 04 2008 12:00am EDT

Why Did JP Morgan Need the Fed's Guarantee?

I got a very good question in my inbox last night:

If JP Morgan did cherry pick and dump the riskiest Bear assets on the Fed, then there's no mistaking the significance of the Fed $29 billion guarantee. If, as JPM claims, they didn't cherry pick, it seems that the relevance of the Fed guarantee might be very minor in relation to potential losses from the retained riskiest assets. Yet the deal couldn't be done without the guarantee. Am I missing something?

Any answers? I have to admit I'm stumped.

Update: Thinking about it a bit more, it does occur to me that with JPM paying only in the $1 billion range for all of BSC's equity, losing the risk associated with a $30 billion bond portfolio could make a significant difference to the purchase price, and possibly bring it up into positive territory. But I'm not even really convincing myself here, especially since JPM is now going to take the first $1 billion of any losses on that portfolio.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Real Business, Real Results
Out of the 'Family'

Did anyone at Microsoft ever watch the (gasp!) offensively funny show Family Guy?

Cruz Missile Lands

Ex-Morgan Stanley exec Zoe Cruz is now heading her own hedge fund. Are Wall Street's leaders done?

Scandal Chic

Martha, Bernie and Skilling know that what you wear for court can go a long way in public perception.

spotlight on

Health Care

Bad to the Bone No More

Companies such as General Mills say they're stepping up efforts to change employees' bad behavior and promote healthier lifestyles. Read More