Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Could Bear Stearns Have Filed for Chapter 11 After All?
Does Ben Bernanke know something the rest of us don't? Here's a little bit of today's testimony:
On March 13, Bear Stearns advised the Federal Reserve and other government agencies that its liquidity position had significantly deteriorated and that it would have to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy the next day unless alternative sources of funds became available.
Now as I understood things, one of the key reasons for the Fed to intervene was precisely that Bear Stearns could not file for Chapter 11, under which it could have continued as a going concern and worked things out over time. Instead (I thought) Bear Stearns would have had to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy: an immediate liquidation, with all the chaos to markets that implies.
If Chapter 11 was really an option, then I have more sympathy for Bear Stearns shareholders than I did before: there's a good chance, with a book value of over $80 a share, that they might have received something over $10 for their stock. In a Chapter 7 liquidation, by contrast, they would surely have been left with nothing. So, was Chapter 11 an option after all?
Update: The Deal had a story back on March 18 headined "Bear Stearns: Ch. 11 never an option". It's possible that Bernanke, an economist and not a bankruptcy lawyer, simply got it wrong. But as Alea notes in the comments, even under Chapter 11 there would have been a lot of pretty disastrous liquidation going on.
