Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Chart of the Day: Fed Lending
WCW has this chart, and says of it:
Any time that a properly normalized series starts rivaling the freaking Depression, you have to worry.
Worry? Yes, I'm worried. But not so much because banks are borrowing from the Fed again after a long Great Moderation in which they didn't. Historically, the Fed has been happy to act as a counterparty for banks; the fact that it didn't for a while is no reason why it shouldn't right now, when it's needed.
When fears of counterparty risk roil the markets, it's great that the Fed can step in with its zero counterparty risk and act as the counterparty of last resort. I am slightly worried about this weekend's announcements, which seem to make the Fed the counterpart of first resort: that spike might yet grow significantly larger.
The Fed has been reasonably imaginative in its response to this crisis. Think of what would have happened if it had stuck to its standard Fed funds instrument: it would have cut interest rates, but the discount rate would still be 100bp north of Funds, and investment banks would have no access to it in any event. The result would have been chaos in the markets: everybody refusing to trade with everybody else.
Instead, the Fed stepped in and said, in effect, we're here to trade with, we have liquidity, come and get it. Once the money starts flowing around the financial system again, it might be able to take a few quiet steps out of the game. But for the time being, anything which encourages banks to trade with each other and trust each other is a good thing. If it's really lucky, the Fed might not even have to take any losses on that $30 billion of non-recourse financing that it gave to Bear Stearns yesterday.






